STOP THE LIES
WE KNOW WHO KILLED BENAZIR BHUTTO
Analysis from the Creative Youth News Team

December 27, 2007

It's time the lies and falsehood coming from the old guys running the major news stations stopped.  Benazir Bhutto was not killed by Islamic terrorists - unless you consider official government assassins to be Islamic terrorists.  The American public has been asked, by the news media, to buy lie after lie after lie.  All too often, Americans dumbed down by years of brain-damaging education lose their ability to think and to distinguish truth from propaganda presented to them by the news media.

When they are legitimate, investigations work like this.  Law enforcement officers who want to solve crimes look at three factors: motive, means and opportunity.  Since, for the last seven years, the Bush Administration and its robotic media have trying to make the public forget how to solve crimes, the Creative Youth News Team will do it for them.

WHO HAD THE MOTIVE TO KILL BENAZIR BHUTTO? 

This isn't a hard question.  Benazir Bhutto was expected to win the upcoming election, which would have changed the power structure and perception of Pakistan.  Who would lose the election to Benazir Bhutto or have their plans for Pakistan thwarted if she stayed alive?  Who would lose economically if she were elected?   Her main political competitors are President Pervez Musharraf and former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.  If Bhutto had succeeded in ending concerns about Islamic terrorism , the economic beneficiaries of the war on terror would lose financially.  Pakistan's relationship with the U.S. Government, which is close to Musharraf, might have changed.

Now, to assist the dumbed-down journalists in the mass media, let's list those with the greatest motives:
1) President Pervez Musharraf.  He was forced to call parliamentary elections for January 8, 2008.   The voter turnout was expected to be in favor of Bhutto if she were alive.
2) Nawaz Sharif.  Bhutto voters would likely turn to him with her out of the picture.
3) The Bush Administration. It requires an unstable world to maintain power.  Bush is a friend of Musharraf.  Bhutto was powerful enough in her own right that she could say "no" to Bush.
4) The U. S. Military Industrial Complex. The U.S. Military Complex includes a lot of organizations, including all the contractors, defense, rebuilding, security, etc., that are benefiting from an unstable world.  When trillions are involved, a lot of corporate executives tend to get very greedy.

Let's list those who did not have any real motive unless they were on salary from the above three.
1) Islamic terrorists.  Why do you think the Islamic masses are protesting her death?

Reasoning ability quiz:
Who would be more likely to kill a Muslim for religious reasons: a Muslim or a Christian?

WHO HAD THE MEANS TO ASSASSINATE BENAZIR BHUTTO?

1. President Pervez Musharraf certainly had the means.  He has the military.  He has prisons full of individuals who could be recruited to do suicide bombings.  He could arrange for the gunman and the bomber to get past Bhutto's security.
2. Nawaz Sharif was a popular prime minister, who was exiled after Musharraf took power and accused Sharif of hijacking a plane.  It appears the verdict, resulting in exile, was politically motivated.  Let's shortcut this. Anyone with the power to be a prime minister has the the resources to carry off an assassination of the nature that took place. His ability was muted, somewhat, by his loss of power. 
3. The Bush Administration.  Examples can be seen in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo.  Is there any reason to question whether the Bush Administration has the means?
4. The U.S. Military Industrial Complex.  This is the richest industry in the world and it has the suicide bombs.

WHO HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASSASSINATE BENAZIR BHUTTO?

1)  The political assassination happened near the capital of the country Musharraf runs.  Of course, he had the opportunity.
2) Sharif was in the country and so was his election team and his supporters.  He was likely being watched by Musharraf's military intelligence.  
3) The Bush Administration has operatives in Pakistan.   The CIA is in Pakistan.  It is supposedly looking to assassinate Osama Bin Laden. 
4) The U.S. Military Industrial Complex has operatives everywhere, working to make deals with foreign government or to overthrow them.  The Bush Administration shares intelligence and resources with this Military Industrial Complex.

Islamic extremists have no motive to assassinate a leader they respect.  They would need a source for the means.  Bhutto undoubtedly had security with the ability to watch for and detect individuals carrying bombs and weapons.  The  gunman and suicide bomber would have had to have been individuals security would have let get close enough to do the shooting and suicide bombing.  This wasn't an act of religious terrorism.  It was a highly thought out professional operation.

There, we've solved the crime.  Now, the issue is whether the old guys in the news media will focus on the group least likely to be responsible for the political assassination or on one of the four who undoubtedly is responsible.  Here's a game plan.  Get a notepad and label it"idiots."   On this notepad, write down the names of all the reporters who use the words "Islamic extremists" to describe the perpetrators of the assassination.

Political assassinations and convenient deaths have become a way of life in American politics.  John F. Kennedy was conveniently killed after he had signed an executive order (Executive Order 11110) that would have destroyed the Federal Reserve Bank and after he made plans to pull America out of Vietnam and to disband the CIA.  His brother Robert was assassinated the night Robert won the California Presidential Primary in 1968.  John's brother Edwards was almost killed in a convenient automobile accident in 1969 that limited his chances of becoming President.  John's son John, Jr., an upcoming President, conveniently died in a plane crash before he could run and win the 2000 election.  Mel Carnahan was killed in another convenient plane crash and beat John Ashcroft as a dead man for a U.S. Senate seat that affected the balance of power in Washington.  Paul Wellstone was killed in another convenient plane crash shortly before the election in 2002,  just in time to stop him from winning re-election to the Senate and beginning a potentially-successful bid for the Presidency in 2004.  Now, American-style Democracy appears to have been exported to Pakistan.

Copyright ©2007 by the Creative Youth News Team.  All rights reserved.

Home

Banner