Karl Rove?  Who needs him when Bush has Democraticunderground.com ready and willing to do his bidding and destroy the lives of every Democrat and liberal who gets out of line.  Forget the fact that most of America wants to impeach George W. Bush.  Since the election, when the public voted for a party they expected to impeach Bush and get us out of the New Vietnam, the public has found that the election was stolen.  This time it was stolen by a group of right-wing Democrats, known as the DLC.  The goal of the DLC is to cut the taxes of the super-wealthy, end protections for consumers, end trade restrictions that protect the environment and workers in America, end educational funding and help build up the war-profiteering machine.  And this is part of the Democratic Party?  It certainly is.  DLC Rahm Emanuel was in charge of the Democratic Party's funding for Congressional candidates and he worked hard to make sure that any Democrat who would do what the people voted for was defeated in the primary.  If a primary winner seemed to likely to do the will of the voters, Rahm made sure that candidates got little or now funding.  To DLC Rahm, a Republican is better than a liberal Democrat.  But why just call him DLC Rahm.  During the Gulf War I, Rahm didn't feel like putting on an American uniform and risking his life for his country, even though he supported sending young Americans to die in his place.  He put on an Israeli uniform and did vehicle maintenance out of the danger zone.  Given a choice between loyalty to the United States and loyalty to the government of Israel, Rahm made his choice.  If the American people had known that the DCCC picks were really picks of someone whose loyalty was to Israel, they might have had buyers remorse.   

There were good Democratic candidates running for office, such as Dennis Kucinich, Cynthia McKinney and Steve Young.  These individuals were opposed to the DLC, rich man's policies and to the wars that Israeli Army Rahm has been forcing on America.    No American Uniform For Me Rham didn't help them at all.  A DLC conservative tried to defeat Dennis in his primary and was trounced by the voters.  Diebold rigged Cynthia's election towards Republican-backed Hank Johnson by leaving her name off voting computers in her own runoff and by having the machines switch votes from McKinney to Johnson as voters watched.  Did Rahm know about the rigging?  Of course, he did.  His office received continuous complaints on the day of the rigging.  He ignored the complaints because the truth might have ended Republican-backed Johnson's chances of replacing a liberal Democrat.  Steve Young would have won his race with a little more funding. He got more votes than a Democrat has ever received in his district, and the district went from a Republican majority district to a district where no party had a majority of registered voters.  Steve's problem was that he actually wanted to do what the American people thought the Democrats would do and this did not sit well enough with Rahm to cause him to do his job and help out Steve.

Oh, this is being side-tracked onto Bait and Switch 2006.  Now, how do you keep those in line who try to remind the Democratic leaders that the people voted for change and not the same-old, same old?  What do you do if you are Bush and you don't want the Democrats in Congress to follow the wishes of the people?  You bring in the Democratic Underground to silence and destroy anyone reminding America of the real reason the Democrats were elected.  That is exactly what the Democratic Underground is doing in the cruelest, most malicious, most vile way imaginable. 

This week, a high school student posted multiple postings on the Democratic Underground regarding impeachment.  The Democratic Underground  has already been silencing a great many of its former members,  with banned members probably outnumbering current members by a 500 to 1 ratio.  Leave it to a high school student to complain when she is banned for posting in a supposedly Democratic group about impeachment. Those who were banned by the DU for backing impeachment were invited to another forum, where they were told they would be treated better.  It was a trap.  She signed up and posted a note about the DU and the sky fell in.  Skinner, the DU adminstrator, got together with the head of the other forum and posted the most slanderous and false comments imaginable against her.  There have been stories about how DU has hurt others in a similar fashion.  The lies were of such an extreme nature that, if there weren't too many gullible Americans who believe what they read, the lies would be laughable.  Basically, she wound up being characterized as a transsexual homophobe, supposedly both a guy and a girl who was homophobic because according to an alleged quote, she supported equality for everyone and equality is homophobic.  It's a crazy argument but it was Skinner who came up with it.  The worst part is that they printed her name, something that was not public information.  Both the DU and the organization that helped the DU hurt the girl had privacy policies that both violated with the release of her name.  With all the social games that sometimes go on in high schools, hopefully this false characterization will only backfire on the DU and on the site that set her up.  This has been the subject of considerable discussion within the youth rights community in my county.   Those who haven't yet acquired any real rights can be destroyed and slandered by those who have all the rights.  If the student had been over 18, would the site that posted the false comments have given her a chance to say whether the statements were true or false before posting them?  Or is it that any website with the name Democrat in the title cannot be trusted to be on the side of real Americans or Democrats?

Since the election,   the DU has banned members for posting Kucinich's call for cutting the funding to Iraq and for supporting impeachment.  The DU's  practice of banning liberals and then attacking them for speaking out is not new. It has a long history of this.    Here are some links to a place where you will find some of the Democratic Underground's past victims:
 http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=164  and http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=202

The people who posted those sad stories are not Republicans or bigots.  They are real individuals, who are sad that they are not allowed to speak the truth at the Democratic Underground.

Youth Rights supporters in my county conducted an investigation of the Democratic Underground.  Individuals joined for the purpose of seeing if supporting impeachment would get them banned.  They were banned so fast, it was unbelievable.  Individuals also went in to see if they would be banned, simply for being young.  These individuals were also banned.  The DU people knew that the high school student was younger.  This is probably why the other site allowed  the DU to defame her.  None of those involved in the test posted anything offensive but were still banned.  If any of them were to speak out, elsewhere, they would probably be defamed in the same way the student above was defamed?

When organizations like the Democratic Underground have to resort to banning and lies in order to keep the public from knowing about the popularity of impeachment, the public sentiment towards impeachment must be very strong.  Will Congress do what the people want?  Not if the Democratic Underground and Bush have his way.

The truth is now out that those who dare to reveal the dark side of the Democratic Underground can expect major retribution.

Copyright © 2006 by Gary F and creativeyouth.net. All rights reserved.

This material is NOT in the Public Domain and all rights and privileges are reserved. All content of this page is under the copyright © of  the respective author and/or CreativeYouth.net .  It may only be copied or used on any website, newsgroups, or anything having to do with the Internet with the expressed written consent of respective author and/or management of creativeyouth.net.  Any and all reproduction of this work MUST contain proper accreditation to both author and this web site. This work is used by permission. All fact checking for accuracy is the personal resposiblity of the authors and NOT of creativeyouth.net.  Creativeyouth.net puts up the articles as written.

home