10/17/08

Did anyone else here watch the debaters?  If you had read a transcript with no names, would you have been able to tell the Democrat from the Republican?  In high school, the teams often wore uniforms so their supporters can tell them apart.  It's time the candidates started wearing party colors so they can be told apart.

The voice left out of the debate was that of the American people.  Independent candidates, on the ballot in enough states to win, were closed out from speaking for the American people.  Wall Street was represented.  The defense industry was represented.   Anti-choice groups were represented. people earning over $100,000 per year were represented.  The average American citizen was not represented at all.

As Gatekeepers, both the Democrats and Republicans have failed.

The Republicans appear to have failed by choice.  They have done little or nothing to assist a flailing McCain-Palin ticket.  Newspapers across the world are calling the election for Obama weeks before the election, itself.  The Republicans took a fall this time.  Democratic activists from 2000 are wondering what is the catch. They have seen vote-fraud, violence against voters and smear campaigns against Democratic candidates.  There is little or none of that this time in comparison with prior races for the White House.  There is no point in discussing the Republicans.  The powers behind the Republican Party are losing by choice.

As Gatekeepers, the Democrats have done more than fail.  They have endangered the American people and subjected them to an unknown leader.  What do you know about Obama?  Did you now that he voted for the war again and again?  Did you know he voted for the PATRIOT Act again and again?  Did you know he supports the right of nuclear companies to prevent you from knowing when the air and water are radioactive?  Did you know that he will profit if you are forced to take the bird flu vaccine? Did you know that he voted for the death penalty?  Did you know that he voted to send American jobs and nuclear arms to foreign countries?  Did you know that he voted for the most racist piece of legislation ever written?  Did you know that his heroes are Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Richard Lugar?  Did you know that he considers the First Gulf War to be a "good war?"

As Gatekeepers, the Democratic party chose to refuse to let top Democratic candidates for President participate in most of the debates.  They allowed Obama to participate in any debate he chose to attend?  Why did Obama get the special treatment?  Why were other candidates vetted while Obama has never produced a birth certificate without certain information either inconsistent with birth records for Hawaii or blacked out?  Did Obama ever attend any school whatsoever or did he have no education of any kind?  He has been unable or unwilling to produce records to show that he graduated from grammar school, high school or any college?   Who is this man?

Very little information is known about Obama's background.  It is known that he worked directly for and was financed by Tony Rezko. Tony Rezko has been convicted of 16 felonies involving selling political influence.  It is known that the Crown family of General Dynamics supports him.  It is known that he used an underhanded and possibly dishonest method to destroy the career of civil rights leader Alice Palmer so that he could get her job.  Those reading Obama's auto-biography have found it riddled with falsehoods and impossibilities.  The general belief is that it was written by someone else to gain support for Obama.

Obama's rise to glory has involved disqualification of opponents through unusual means, staged faintings at his rallies and the taking of large amounts of money from questionable people with ties to the corporate underworld.  Nadhmi Auchi, convinced of serious offenses in Europe, was among Obama's inner circle.  At a function for Auchi, Obama toasted his mentor.  Information regarding campaign meetings between David Axelrod and Obama in Obama's Senate office was never investigated. 

The Democratic Party is supposed to have an ethical duty to prevent Republican infiltrators from running as Democrats.  It has an obligation to make sure that its candidates actually exist and that they are who they claim to be.  Why are there so many questions regarding Obama and his background information so close to the election? Is he who he claims to be?  Even if he is legitimate, why are the Democrats running a candidate who will not show any evidence that he is who he claims to be?

Much of Obama's campaign has been a campaign of hate against the first African-American Congresswoman from the State of Georgia.  Obama's supporters have been claiming that anyone voting for a different African American than Obama must be doing so out of racism.  Obama supporters go out of their way to belittle and harass the McKinney supporters.  Perhaps it is because, McKinney actually voted against the war and the attacks on our freedom that Obama supported in the Senate.  Perhaps it is because McKinney filed Articles of Impeachment against George W. Bush while Obama spoke in support of Bush.  Asking why Obama supporters have gone out of their way to harass and attack McKinney supporters is pointless.  Perhaps it is because she went to college and can prove it.  Asking why Obama supporters are so afraid of votes for McKinney is pointless.  What matters is that the politics of hate continues.  This time it is aimed at thinking independents.

Why do Democratic supporters back a candidate about whom they know absolutely nothing?   Why did they select a candidate with a clandestine past over many with known pasts?  Why don't supporters care about where Obama really stands on the issues?  If Obama is elected by people who don't know and don't care where he stands, how can anyone hold him accountable for policies he never supported before getting elected?  Do you ever wonder what his supporters have been drinking?

 In football, sometimes the quarterback cannot see his target and just throws the ball.  Usually this is a mistake.Voting for an unknown candidate may be a major mistake when there are independents who are willing to guarantee a policy victory for the voters.

Copyright ©2008 by Simon F.  and creativeyouth.net. All rights reserved.

This material is NOT in the Public Domain and all rights and privileges are reserved. All content of this page is under the copyright of the respective author and/or CreativeYouth.net .  It may only be copied or used on any website, newsgroups, or anything having to do with the Internet with the expressed written consent of respective author and/or management of creativeyouth.net.  Any and all reproduction of this work MUST contain proper accreditation to both author and this web site. This work is used by permission. All fact-checking for accuracy is the personal responsibility of the author and NOT of creativeyouth.net  Creativeyouth.net  puts up the articles as written.

Home